Historical Accuracy in Films Essay - 1871 Words

Historically accurate movies that are also captivating have an immense burden to meet. To capture the essence of the time through a personal story that captivates movie executives who regularly make movies with Steven Seagall and Bruce Willis seems an almost insurmountable task. But difficulties in sales aside, there are two crucial elements for movies about history to be the most effective they can be. These elements are historical accuracy in a personal story, and a sense of hope. brbrHistorical accuracy does not mean trying to encompass everything that happened in a particular time period. Rather, it requires a story that highlights key elements of the period involved while containing nothing that could never have happened in the†¦show more content†¦He has essentially risen from the dead life of being a slave to the land of the free, where the horses run as free as men. uThe Last Supper/u is a successful film on both emotional and intellectual levels because it panders t o the heart with a personal incident and gives the mind hope to ponder.brbruAmistad/u desperately wants to be as important in American culture as uThe Last Supper/u is in Cuban culture. Even though that success was not attained, it is still a very powerful historical epic. Again, the story is true, but embellished for the screen. And again, this is not a problem, because in its embellishment it has not truly distorted the realities of slavery in Southern society. And uAmistad/u, even more than uThe Last Supper/u, has a very clear level of academic entertainment. The slavery in uAmistad/u is fought on a purely ideological level. We are given a white mans court to decide the fate of the prisoners of the uAmistad/u - its a clear picture of the interaction between Europeans and Africans. The questions Spielberg poses are many: Should this be the proper way to handle justice on a people that do not understand or respect the system? How is it that justice could be served in this case with out making theShow MoreRelatedHistorical Accuracies in the Snyders Film 3001593 Words   |  6 Pages300: Historical Accuracies in the Snyders Film Introduction Herodotus and Zac Snyder have at least one thing in common: they both portray the ancient Persians in very unflattering terms. The grim, ghastly, almost monstrously barbaric (yet weirdly effeminate) features of the Persian leader Xerxes is one of the most visually arresting elements of Snyders film 300 (based on a graphic novel by Frank Miller). How historically accurate is the film? Considering the fact that Snyder shot almost the entiretyRead MoreHistorical Investigation to Prove Accuracy in the Film, Defiance1792 Words   |  7 PagesThe investigation assesses how accurate the film â€Å"Defiance† was in portraying the experiences of Bielski Otriad. In order to understand how accurate the film â€Å"Defiance† was, research has to be done to investigate specific internal and external situations the Bielskis faced during World War II in the forests of Belarus. Assessing the differences and the similarities in both the movie and the documentary will be the method used to analyse. The method that will be used in the analysis will explain theRead MoreHistorical Accuracy Of The Film Good Night, And Good Luck2340 Words   |  10 PagesHistorical Accuracy of the film Good Night, and Good Luck Ed Murrow is one of the most well known and respected American television journalists of all time, and a source of inspiration for many. He is portrayed in George Clooney’s, Good Night, and Good Luck, as the anchor to the news show, See it Now, specifically surrounding the episodes focused on McCarthyism. These episodes were aired in the early 1950’s in the midst of the cold war and an era of intense anti-communist sentiment in America. McCarthyismRead MoreHistorical Accuracy of the Film Good Night Good Luck Essay781 Words   |  4 Pagescontroversial historical programs. Joe McCarthy a nobody Wisconsin’s junior senator made his name when he gave a speech claiming his empty briefcase held the names of 205 communists. The movie â€Å"Good Night and Good Luck† tells the story how media ended Joseph McCarthy’s commy hunt and his political career. â€Å"Good Night and Good Luck† impeccable historical accuracy is demonstrated by showing McCarthy in actual film. The Film easily found actors to play McCarthy’s part however actual film gives a viewRead MoreDjango Untrained Analysis1525 Words   |  7 PagesWhat is the historical significance of Tarantino’s Django Unchained? Racism has been a prevalent issue throughout the history of the United States. From the introduction of slaves to the â€Å"New World† in the 17th century to the killing of innocent black individuals by police officers today, racism has defined this country. Director Quentin Tarantino, in his spaghetti western film Django: Unchained, addressed this issue. The film features a black slave who is freed at and sets out on a revenge missionRead MoreThe Education Medium For The Course1506 Words   |  7 Pagesitself or the academy award winning film. Both mediums have their advantages and disadvantages as a teaching aid. After some consideration, I will be using the film as the education medium for the course. While the book is a fountain of information, I believe the film will be more beneficial for a first year history course. This film will truly engage the students and give them a better understanding of the unfortunate events of historical slavery. Though, the film is not the primary evidence of slaveryRead MoreHistorical Fiction And Its Importance On Society805 Words   |  4 Pagesmovies about historical figures and events. Historical fiction is one of the most popular film genres. The general assumption is that it helps people remember and understand history, giving us facts with some creative liberties. In truth, it is changing the way we see history and thus changing our traditions and our culture. The paper that follows should  · Explain the reasoning behind creating a historical fictional movie  · Explaining the importance of historical accuracy in fictionalRead MoreEgyptian Tales Galore Essay1525 Words   |  7 Pagesjoint army effort of the lovers and Antony committed suicide thinking Cleopatra did while Cleopatra committed suicide two weeks after, letting her children and Egypt go under Rome’s rule. To be able to analyze how the inaccuracies of the film affect the overall accuracy of the movie, we must check the inaccuracy of the costume design, character/figure portrayal and set design and set facts. A major aspect of the movie Cleopatra that was portrayed inaccurately was the costume design. (i) The first thingRead MoreOur World War Film Analysis1099 Words   |  5 Pagesalongside the British response. Moreover, the movie does slightly renders the British retreat in the Battle of Mons as the films primary focus were the two British machine gunners defending the Nimy bridge, and ending when those defenses fail. Additionally, this may cause some concern in the eyes of some historians as dramatized in regards to the audience. Although heroic, the film/episode focuses on the two British machine gunner nests, having (hypothetical) brothers take over the MG as the previousRead MoreSchindler s List Of The Holocaust Essay1635 Words   |  7 Pagesacclaimed Holocaust films in the United States. Director Steven Spielberg set out to make a historically accurate film about Oskar Schindler, portrayed by Liam Neeson, and his Jews. It has been over 20 years since the film’s release an d Schindler’s List continues to reign supreme when it comes to Holocaust films. However, this is not to say that the film has not been without controversy specifically surrounding the film’s historical accuracy. While often hailed for its accuracy, it would be inaccurate

Feminism And The Second Wave Feminist Movement - 1473 Words

Intersectionality underscores that it is impossible to consider gender in isolation from other forms of difference. Critically discuss the significance of this, including its implications for feminism. Refer to at least 3 readings in the unit read from weeks 1-6. Intersectionality provides a key structure for analysing oppression and privilege in our modern and diverse society. Views of intersectionality have changed rapidly throughout the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Many aspects of the third wave feminist movement are underpinned by notions of intersectionality, though its success of application may be varied. This marks a shift from the homogenous view of femininity and womanhood held by many, particularly white and middle†¦show more content†¦The intersection of race and gender has provoked a lot discussion, especially in the latter part of the twentieth century. The nature of feminism in the era made it difficult for women of colour to find a fitting place to benefit from the social advances being made for women. Disability oppression is an example of the way other forms of oppression interact with gender and both reflect and stand separate from gender oppression. As made clear in these examples, modern feminism must le arn to embrace intersectional ideas to combat issues on all axes of oppression, because there are many things which intersect and play off of gender, and these cannot be isolated to a single dichotomy of oppressed and privileged. Certain brands of feminism place gender as the key axis of oppression on which women are oppressed. This was a contributing factor in the united sisterhood and womanhood of the second wave, an ideal which led to the marginalisation and erasure of many women’s experience such as women of colour, women with disabilities, women of lower socioeconomic class and standing, and so on. When second wave feminists do embrace an intersectional view, they tend to employ an additive measure of intersectionality rather than a multiplicative view, which is detrimental and erasive because it often causes oppressions to be ranked in a hierarchy of perceived importance, and from a feminist point of view it is gender

The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ Chapter 6 Free Essays

string(68) " and reported them faithfully to Christ, who wrote everything down\." Feeding the Crowd Knowing how highly Jesus had regarded John, some of those followers of the Baptist came to Galilee and told him what had happened; and Jesus, wanting to be alone, went out in a boat by himself. No one knew where he had gone, but Christ let one or two people know, and soon the word got around. When Jesus came ashore in what he thought would be a lonely place, he found a great crowd waiting for him. We will write a custom essay sample on The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ Chapter 6 or any similar topic only for you Order Now He felt sorry for them, and began to speak, and some people who were sick felt themselves uplifted by his presence, and declared themselves cured. It was nearly evening, and Jesus’s disciples said to him, ‘This is the middle of nowhere, and all these people need to eat. Tell them to go away now, and find a village where they can buy food. They can’t stay here all night.’ Jesus said, ‘They don’t need to go away. As for food, what have you got between you?’ ‘Five loaves and two fishes, master; nothing else.’ ‘Give them to me,’ said Jesus. He took the loaves and the fishes, and blessed them, and then said to the crowd, ‘See how I share this food out? You do the same. There’ll be enough for everyone.’ And sure enough, it turned out that one man had brought some barley cakes, and another had a couple of apples, and a third had some dried fish, and a fourth had a pocketful of raisins, and so on; and between them all, there was plenty to go round. No one was left hungry. And Christ, watching it all and taking notes, recorded this as another miracle. The Informant, and the Canaanite Woman But Christ couldn’t follow Jesus everywhere. It would have attracted notice, and by this time he was sure he should remain very much in the background. Accordingly, he asked one of the disciples to tell him what happened when he wasn’t there keeping it quiet, of course. ‘There’s no need to tell Jesus about it,’ Christ told him. ‘But I’m keeping a record of his wise words and his marvellous deeds, and it would be a great help if I could rely on an accurate report.’ ‘Who is this for?’ said the disciple. ‘It’s not for the Romans, is it? Or the Pharisees or the Sadducees?’ ‘No, no. It’s for the sake of the Kingdom of God. Every kingdom has its historian, or how would we know of the great deeds of David and Solomon? That’s my role: just a simple historian. Will you help me?’ The disciple agreed, and soon he had something to tell. It happened when Jesus was away from Galilee, travelling in the coastal region between Tyre and Sidon. Evidently his fame had already reached those parts, because a woman from that district, a Canaanite, heard he was passing by and came running to cry out: ‘Have mercy on me, son of David!’ She addressed him like that despite the fact that she was a Gentile. However, it made little impression on Jesus, who took no notice of her, though the woman’s cries began to annoy the disciples who were with him. ‘Send her away, master!’ they said. Finally he turned to her and said, ‘I haven’t come to speak to the Gentiles. I’m here for the house of Israel, not for you.’ ‘But please, master!’ she said. ‘My daughter is tormented by a demon, and I’ve got no one else to ask!’ And she threw herself to her knees in front of him and said, ‘Lord, help me!’ ‘Should I take food meant for the children, and throw it to the dogs?’ Jesus said. But this woman was clever enough to find an answer, and she said, ‘Even the dogs can eat the crumbs that fall from the master’s table.’ That answer pleased him, and he said, ‘Woman, your faith has saved your daughter. Go home and find her well.’ The disciple reported this, and Christ wrote it down. The Woman with the Ointment Shortly afterwards Jesus had another encounter with a woman, and the disciple reported this as well. It happened in Magdala at a private dinner in the house of a Pharisee called Simon. A woman of the city heard he was there, and came bringing Jesus a gift of ointment in an alabaster jar. The host let her in and she knelt before Jesus and wept, bathing his feet with her tears, drying them with her hair, and anointing them with the precious unguent. The host said quietly to the disciple who was Christ’s informant, ‘If this master of yours were really a prophet, he’d know what kind of woman this is ?C she’s a notorious sinner.’ But Jesus overheard, and said, ‘Simon, come here. I want to ask you a question.’ ‘Certainly,’ said the Pharisee. ‘Suppose there’s a man who’s owed money by two others. One owes him five hundred denarii, and the other owes him fifty. Now, suppose they can’t pay, and he forgives them and wipes off their debts. Which of them will be more grateful?’ ‘I suppose the one who owed five hundred,’ said Simon. ‘Exactly,’ said Jesus. ‘Now, you see this woman? You see what she’s doing? When I came into your house you offered me no water to wash my feet, but here she is bathing them with her tears. You didn’t greet me with a kiss, but from the moment she’s come in she hasn’t stopped kissing my feet. You gave me no oil, but she’s lavished this precious ointment on me. There’s a reason for that: she has committed great sins, but they’ve been forgiven, and that’s why she loves so deeply. You haven’t committed many sins, so it means little to you to know that they’ve been forgiven. And you love me so much the less as a result.’ The others at the dinner were astonished at his words, but the disciple took care to remember them, and reported them faithfully to Christ, who wrote everything down. You read "The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ Chapter 6" in category "Essay examples" As for the woman, she became a follower of Jesus, and one of the most faithful. The Stranger Talks of Truth and History Christ never knew when the stranger would come to him. The next time he appeared it was late at night, and the stranger’s voice spoke quietly through his window: ‘Christ, come and tell me what has been happening.’ Christ gathered his scrolls together and left the house on tiptoe. The stranger beckoned him away from the town and up on to the dark hillside where they could talk without being overheard. The stranger listened without interrupting while Christ told him everything Jesus had done since the sermon on the mountain. ‘Well done,’ said the stranger. ‘This is excellent work. How did you hear about the events in Tyre and Sidon? You did not go there, I think.’ ‘I asked one of his disciples to keep me informed,’ said Christ. ‘Without letting Jesus know, of course. I hope that was permitted?’ ‘You have a real talent for this task.’ ‘Thank you, sir. There is one thing that would help me do it better, though. If I knew the reason for your enquiries I could look more purposefully. Are you from the Sanhedrin?’ ‘Is that what you think? And what do you understand of the function of the Sanhedrin?’ ‘Why, it’s the body that determines great matters of law and doctrine. And of course it deals with taxes and administrative business, and ?C and so on. Naturally I don’t mean to imply that it’s a mere bureaucracy, although such things are, of course, necessary in human affairs†¦ ‘ ‘What did you tell the disciple who is your informant?’ ‘I told him that I was writing the history of the Kingdom of God, and that he would be helping in that great task.’ ‘A very good answer. You could do worse than apply it to your own question. In helping me, you are helping to write that history. But there is more, and this is not for everyone to know: in writing about what has gone past, we help to shape what will come. There are dark days approaching, turbulent times; if the way to the Kingdom of God is to be opened, we who know must be prepared to make history the handmaid of posterity and not its governor. What should have been is a better servant of the Kingdom than what was. I am sure you understand me.’ ‘I do,’ said Christ. ‘And, sir, if you read my scrolls-‘ ‘I shall read them with close attention, and with gratitude for your unselfish and courageous work.’ The stranger took the bundle of scrolls under his cloak, and stood up to leave. ‘Remember what I told you when we first met,’ he said. ‘There is time, and there is what is beyond time. History belongs to time, but truth belongs to what is beyond time. In writing of things as they should have been, you are letting truth into history. You are the word of God.’ ‘When will you come again?’ said Christ. ‘I shall come when I am needed. And when I come again, we shall talk about your brother.’ A moment later, the stranger had disappeared in the darkness of the hillside. Christ sat for a long time in the cold wind, pondering on what the stranger had said. The words ‘we who know’ were some of the most thrilling he had ever heard. And he began to wonder if he had been right to think that the stranger came from the Sanhedrin; the man hadn’t exactly denied it, but he seemed to have a range of knowledge and a point of view that was quite unlike those of any lawyer or rabbi Christ had ever heard. In fact, now that he thought about it, Christ realised that the stranger was unlike anyone he had ever come across. What he said was so strikingly different from anything Christ had read in the Torah, or heard in the synagogue, that he began to wonder whether the stranger was a Jew at all. He spoke Aramaic perfectly, but it was much more likely, given all the circumstances, that he was a Gentile, perhaps a Greek philosopher from Athens or Alexandria. And Christ went home to his bed, full of humble joy at his own prescience; for hadn’t he spoken to Jesus in the wilderness about the need to include the Gentiles in the great organisation that would embody the Kingdom of God? ‘Who Do You Say I Am?’ Around that time, King Herod began to hear rumours of this man who was going about the country healing the sick and speaking words of prophecy. He was alarmed, because some people were saying that John the Baptist had been raised from the dead. Herod knew full well that John was dead, for hadn’t he himself ordered the man’s execution, and offered his head on a platter to Salome? But then other rumours began to circulate: this new preacher was Elijah himself, returned to Israel after hundreds of years; or he was this prophet or that one, come back to chastise the Jews and foretell catastrophe. Naturally, all this concerned Herod deeply, and he sent out word that he would be glad to see the preacher in person. He was unsuccessful in this attempt to meet Jesus, but Christ noted it down as evidence of how well known his brother was becoming. To go by what his informant told him, though, it was clear to Christ that Jesus was not happy about this increasing fame. On one occasion, in the region of the Decapolis, he cured a deaf man who had a speech impediment, and ordered the man’s friends to say nothing about it, but they went and told everyone they knew. Another time, in Bethsaida, he restored the sight of a blind man, and when the man could see again Jesus told him to go straight home and not even go into the village; but word got out about that too. Then there was an occasion in Caesarea Philippi when Jesus was walking along with his disciples, and they were talking about the public following he was gathering. ‘Who do people say I am?’ Jesus asked. ‘Some say Elijah,’ said one disciple. Another said, ‘They think you’re John the Baptist, come back to life.’ ‘They say all kinds of names ?C prophets, mainly,’ said a third. ‘Like Jeremiah, for instance.’ ‘But who do you say I am?’ said Jesus. And Peter said, ‘You’re the Messiah.’ ‘Is that what you think?’ said Jesus. ‘Well, you’d better hold your tongue about it. I don’t want to hear that sort of talk, you understand?’ When Christ heard about this he hardly knew how to record it for the Greek stranger. He was confused, and wrote it down in the disciple’s words, and then erased them and tried to formulate the expression to be more in keeping with what the stranger had said about truth and history; but that confused him further, so that all his wits seemed to lie scattered about him instead of working firmly at his command. Finally he gathered himself and wrote down what the disciple had told him, up to the point where Peter spoke. Then a thought came to him, and he wrote something new. Knowing how highly Jesus regarded Peter, he wrote that Jesus had praised him for seeing something that only his Father in heaven could have revealed, and that he had gone on to make a pun on Peter’s name, saying that he was the rock on which Jesus would build his church. That church would be so firmly established that the gates of hell would not prevail against it. Finally, Christ wrote that Jesus had promised to give Peter the keys of heaven. When he had written these words, he trembled. He wondered if he were being presumptuous in making Jesus express the thoughts that he himself had put to his brother in the wilderness, about the need for an organisation that would embody the Kingdom on earth. Jesus had scorned the idea. But then Christ remembered what the stranger had said: that in writing like this, he was letting truth from beyond time into history, and thus making history the handmaid of posterity and not its governor; and he felt uplifted. How to cite The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ Chapter 6, Essay examples

Chemistry Redox Reactions Explained Sample Essay Example For Students

Chemistry Redox Reactions Explained Sample Essay HOW ARE REDOX REACTIONS DIFFERENT?Redox is the term used to label reactions in which the credence of an negatron ( decrease ) by a stuff is matched with the contribution of an negatron ( oxidization ) . A big figure of the reactions already mentioned in the Reactions chapter are redox reactions. Synthesis reactions are besides redox reactions if there is an exchange of negatrons to do an ionic bond. If chlorine gas is added to sodium metal to do Na chloride. the Na has donated an negatron and the Cl has accepted an negatron to go a chloride ion or an affiliated Cl. If a compound divides into elements in a decomposition. a decomposition reaction could be a redox reaction. The electrolysis of H2O is a redox reaction. With a direct electric current through it. H2O can be separated into O and H. H2O H2 + O2 The O and H in the H2O are attached by a covalent bond that breaks to do the component O and the component H. Learning more about the conditions for oxidation-reduction reactions will demo that the electrolysis of H2O is a redox reaction. A individual replacing reaction is ever a redox reaction because it involves an component that becomes incorporated into a compound and an component in the compound being released as a free component. A dual replacing reaction normally is non a redox reaction. Back to the top of Redox. OXIDATION StatesBefore we go any farther into oxidation-reduction. we must understand oxidization provinces. The thought of oxidization province began with whether or non a metal was attached to an O. Unattached ( free ) atoms have an oxidization province of nothing. Since O about ever takes in two negatrons when it is non a free component. the combined signifier of O ( oxide ) has an oxidization province of subtraction two. The exclusion to a combined O taking two negatrons is the peroxide constellation. Peroxide can be represented by -O-O- where the each elan is a covalent bond and each ‘O’ is an O atom. Peroxide can be written as a symbol. ( O2 ) 2- . The over-simplified manner of demoing this is that each O atom has a negative one oxidization province. but that is non truly so because the peroxides do non come in single O atoms. Hydrogen peroxides are non every bit stable as oxides. and there are really many fewer peroxides in nature than oxides. H2O2 is hydrogen peroxide. Hydrogen in compound ever has an oxidization province of plus one. except as a hydride. A hydride is a compound of a metal and H. The H atoms in a hydride have the oxidization province of -1. Hydrides react with H2O. so there are no hydrides found in nature. The expression XH or XH2 or XH3 or even XH4 where X is a metal is the general chemical expression for hydride. The regulations for oxidization province are in some ways arbitrary and unnatural. but here they are: 1. Any free ( unattached ) component with no charge has the oxidization province of nothing. Diatomic gases such as O2 and H2 are besides in this class. 2. All compounds have a net oxidization province of nothing. The oxidization province of all of the atoms add up to zero. 3. Any ion has the oxidization province that is the charge of that ion. Polyatomic ions ( groups ) have an oxidization province for the whole ion that is the charge on that ion. The ions of elements in Group I. II. and VII ( halogens ) and some other elements merely have one likely oxidization province. 4. Oxygen in compound has an oxidization province of subtraction two. except for O as peroxide. which is minus one. 5. Hydrogen in compound has an oxidization province of plus one. except for H as hydride. which is minus one. 6. In groups or little covalent molecules. the component with the greatest electronegativity has its natural ion charge as its oxidization province. | KNOW THIS Parts of Speech Persuasive EssayCu0 Cu+2 + 2 e- and the entire reaction is: Cu0 + 2Ag+ Cu+2 + 2Ag0In the complete reaction the figure of negatrons lost must be the figure of negatrons gained. The figure of negatrons used in the decrease half reaction must be the figure of negatrons produced in the oxidization half reaction. The full half reactions must be multiplied by Numberss that will equalise the Numberss of negatrons. and the concluding complete balanced chemical reaction must demo these figure relationships. One of the of import spots of information from adding the half reactions in this instance is that the full chemical equation will hold to hold two Ag atoms for every Cu atom in the reaction for the reaction to equilibrate electrically. This type of information from the half reactions is sometimes the easiest or merely manner to equilibrate a chemical equation. The oxidation-reduction equilibrating jobs get downing with figure 31 at the terminal of the chapter are good aid for your farther apprehension. From making this math on a figure of stuffs. you will happen that it is possible to acquire some strange-looking oxidization provinces. to include some fractional 1s. The oxidization province math plants on fractional oxidization provinces besides. even though fractional charges are non possible. Decrease OR OXIDATION?A decrease of a stuff is the addition of negatrons. An oxidization of a stuff is the loss of negatrons. This system comes from the observation that stuffs combine with O in changing sums. For case. an Fe saloon oxidizes ( combines with O ) to go rust. We say that the Fe has oxidized. The Fe has gone from an oxidization province of nothing to ( normally ) either iron II or Fe III. This may be hard to retrieve. The easier manner to state if a half reaction is a decrease or oxidization is to plot the altering ion into the figure line. If the oxidization province of the ion goes up the figure line. it is an oxidization. If it goes down the figure line. it is a decrease. Based on the KIS rule ( Keep It Simple ) . retrieve merely one regulation for this. Person. in a tantrum of contrariness. decided that we needed more description for the procedure. A stuff that becomes oxidized is a cut downing agent. and a stuff that becomes reduced is an oxidizing agent.